Featured
Table of Contents
Federal financing cuts; attacks on equity, immigrants, the guideline of law, and the country's democracy; a new tax bill; and the growing use of artificial intelligence are just a few of the aspects that have actually upended the not-for-profit world. Amid this upheaval, how can funders and their beneficiaries get ready for 2026 and beyond? In this special package, you'll speak with structure leaders and major donors about offering trends in the coming year and efforts to react to Trump administration hazards.
You'll find strong predictions from leaders and thinkers throughout the sector about what lies ahead, including what the sector will look like five years from now, and how to react to what guarantees to be another unprecedented year. It's time to shed our fear and acknowledge that those who want modification will stop working if individuals closest to the cash do not have the courage to bear the most run the risk of.
Kathleen Enright, president & CEO, Council on Foundations The humanitarian sector should be clear-eyed about the challenges ahead: the pattern of targeted attacks and government overreach designed to suppress our most essential freedoms. John Palfrey, president, MacArthur Structure Nonprofits are addicted to the hamster wheel of fundraising, and in 2026, AI might supersize both the wheel and the dependency.
Michael McAfee, CEO, PolicyLink It's hard to picture passage anytime soon of legislation needing greater payment rates. Bella DeVaan and Chuck Collins collaborate the Charity Reform Effort, Institute for Policy Studies Interaction is no longer background sound. It's a battlefield. Matt Watkins, CEO, Watkins Public Affairs Funders will converge around pluralism, not since it's simple however since it's important.
Dimple Abichandani, author of A New Era of Philanthropy. Lighthouse illustration by Greg Mably for The Chronicle of Philanthropy.
Findings from Church Mutual can help guide nonprofits as they browse 2026 and modifications in generational giving. In December of 2025, the "2026 Charitable Offering in America" survey was conducted by Church Mutual, taking responses from 1,010 grownups who contribute economically to nonprofits and other charitable causes. According to a short article on the study from NonProfitPro, Church Mutual suggests numerous important trends within the not-for-profit fundraising world, including the worrying truth that donors are preparing to downsize their giving up 2026.
Analysing Traditional Grants Vs Long-Term Partnership ModelsWith that, here are 5 essential takeaways from the Church Mutual 2026 study: The Church Mutual survey discovered homes of worship continue to take in the lion's share of donations. All four generations represented (Gen Z, millennials, Gen X, and Baby Boomers) contributed mainly to places of worship, constituting 74% of charitable donations.
Organizations that have spiritual ties must highlight this connection to donors, specifically if they actively support holy places or schools. Another important finding from the study was that donors tended to make their contributions toward the end of the year (OctoberDecember). Throughout the four generations, end-of-year contributions comprised the highest portion, with JanuaryMarch taking 2nd place, followed by AprilJune, then JulySeptember.
Furthermore, out of the 4 generations, Gen Z was probably to offer during the slowest time of the year (JulySeptember). Those who operate in the not-for-profit space should remember of the end-of-year influx in contributions, which suggests that OctoberDecember projects such as Offering Tuesday occasions, matches, etc, could generate a fundraising windfall.
That said, "slow-down" periods should not be ignored, as the more youthful generations may still be inclined to offer even when the older ones are not. The survey includes an area that details "donation expectations" for 2026, and it is these findings that might sound alarm bells. On the one hand, around half of donors (48%) said they will not make any changes to their monetary contributions, with Boomers being the group most likely to leave their charitable offering unchanged.
Millennials were identified as the group more than likely to cut their providing, whereas Gen Z was not just recognized as the group least likely to cut their offering, however likewise the group most likely to increase their giving up 2026. Church Mutual has a couple of areas dedicated to the main monetary issues of donors, something that falls beyond the scope of this article.
One finding that nonprofits need to also understand is that a bulk of donors have issues about the monetary health of the groups they support. Church Mutual found that 54% of donors are stressed over the financial health of the recipients of their contributions. By generation, Gen Z was the most worried, followed by millennials and Gen X respectively, while Boomers were the least concerned.
They ought to be prepared to address younger donors' issues and be proactive in dealing with any concerns affecting the company internally. Doing so might make a difference in winning over younger donors during financially uncertain times. While lower monetary contributions may be worrisome for nonprofits, there might be some great news.
When asked if they would increase "effort and time" to assist in other methods must they minimize their monetary donations, a majority of donors indicated they would; 26% said they were "most likely" and 32% stated "somewhat most likely," equating to 58% of donors in general. The research study suggests these reactions could indicate "strong capacity to transform decreased financial providing into more volunteering, advocacy, or other non-financial support." In the face of smaller financial contributions, nonprofits should lean into other channels to engage their donors.
There are other findings from Church Mutual that were not covered in this article, such as donation methods and the leading monetary concerns of donors, and so I motivate all those in the not-for-profit area to go through the report. The findings from Church Mutual can assist guide nonprofits as they navigate 2026, particularly as Gen Z starts to handle a more popular function in the giving world.
Register for the Johnson Center's e-mail newsletter! This year marks a turning point for the Johnson Center: the tenth edition of our 11 Trends in Philanthropy report. What started in 2017 as a modest supplement to our yearly report has turned into a commonly checked out and gone over publication, reaching more than 100,000 readers each year.
Generally, these short articles explore new shifts or progressing motions throughout the field of philanthropy. For this tenth edition, however, we have actually taken a different approach. Instead of identifying an entirely new set of emerging patterns, we have turned our attention backwards to reflect on the themes that have formed our sector over the past ten years, and to name both withstanding shifts and new advancements.
It is likewise a recommendation of the minute we discover ourselves in a minute of hyper disturbance, that integrates both terrific anxiety about where we are headed and terrific possibility for what might come next. Our future feels more uncertain than ever, but the chance to produce and scale life-changing developments for our communities feels present.
As executive orders, legal contests, and legal arguments play out, we do not have a clear photo of just how much federal financing has actually been rescinded or withheld from nonprofits and communities. We do not understand how numerous nonprofits have closed or will close their doors, how lots of personnel have actually lost their tasks, or how numerous communities have lost access to crucial services.
Latest Posts
Innovative Local Engagement Strategies for Impact
Maximising Company CSR for Good
Creating Lasting Community Good Via Philanthropy